H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Zhizhen Zhang vs Jiri Vesely H2H: 0-1
Jiri Vesely holds a 1–0 lead over Zhizhen Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vesely leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Vesely won the 2015 Shenzhen fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2015* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jiri Vesely | 6-2 6-3 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhizhen Zhang | Jiri Vesely | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |