H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Zizou Bergs vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 0-1

Dusan Lajovic holds a 1–0 lead over Zizou Bergs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2023 Chengdu Open first round 6-4 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zizou Bergs
Belgium Age 27 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #52 6-4 1-6 6-3 Zizou Bergs #172 Match data Sep 23, 2023* R32 Chengdu Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zizou Bergs #37 #33 1,365 1,834 60 70 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zizou Bergs Dusan Lajovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0
21 2020 1–1 50.0% #437 1,501 0 0 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0
22 2021 1–2 33.3% #192 1,545 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0
23 2022 0–3 0.0% #129 1,530 0 0 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0
24 2023 2–6 25.0% #129 1,550 0 0 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0
25 2024 13–17 43.3% #71 1,745 0 0 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0
26 2025 28–25 52.8% #42 1,776 0 0 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0
27 2026 15–16 48.4% #37 1,789 0 1 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zizou Bergs Dusan Lajovic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2022 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
24 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2024 9 9 18 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2025 22 17 39 56.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2026 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 37 43 80 46.2% 11 17 28 39.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/131 of Zizou Bergs's and 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Zizou Bergs Dusan Lajovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0%
21 2020 2/2 7.5 2.0 67.0% 66.8% 55.4% 74.2% 44.4% 62.9% 38.3% 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8%
22 2021 3/3 4.0 4.0 68.7% 69.0% 44.0% 60.2% 41.0% 60.8% 33.7% 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2%
23 2022 3/3 5.0 1.7 64.6% 70.5% 49.5% 63.3% 55.6% 63.1% 35.9% 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8%
24 2023 8/8 8.5 3.6 66.0% 74.4% 50.5% 54.0% 37.0% 66.1% 33.9% 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8%
25 2024 29/30 6.7 3.4 62.3% 71.9% 52.2% 60.5% 36.3% 64.3% 36.0% 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7%
26 2025 52/53 6.6 4.3 58.1% 72.4% 51.0% 51.3% 36.8% 63.5% 36.7% 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4%
27 2026 31/32 7.5 4.9 58.9% 73.3% 48.9% 47.4% 34.3% 63.2% 36.3% 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6%
Career — 128/131 6.9 4.1 60.3% 72.4% 50.6% 53.5% 36.8% 63.7% 36.2% — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zizou Bergs Dusan Lajovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2016 1495 103.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 1488 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 1478 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
21 2020 1502 112.6 +0.15 -0.49 1.032 50.6% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.10 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05
22 2021 1546 116.1 -0.94 +0.02 0.860 47.4% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — -0.29 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43
23 2022 1530 106.2 -0.13 -0.17 0.971 50.0% — — — 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–1 — +0.24 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53
24 2023 1550 119.7 +0.77 -0.52 1.000 49.9% -63 +89 — 37.5% -0.21 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.35 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93
25 2024 1745 135.5 +0.14 +0.37 1.008 49.9% -50 -29 -112 48.8% -0.34 3–9 (25%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.32 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09
26 2025 1776 140.2 -0.61 +1.15 1.005 50.1% +24 -140 -136 48.4% -0.16 10–4 (71%) 14–14 (50%) — +1.30 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07
27 2026 1789 135.6 -1.16 +0.93 0.987 49.5% -47 -147 -31 47.6% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.30 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1602 116.0 -1.28 -0.19 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45
Career — 1834 136.0 -0.47 +0.73 0.997 49.8% -12 -68 -83 47.0% -0.17 20–24 (45%) 30–33 (48%) 98.7 +0.14 — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.