H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Adriana Rikl Gersi vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 0-1

Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Rikl Gersi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 2000 Libéma Open round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adriana Rikl Gersi
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jana Nejedly
CAN Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jana Nejedly #71 6-3 6-0 Adriana Rikl Gersi #66 Match data Jun 22, 2000* R32 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Adriana Rikl Gersi #898 #48 551 1,644 54 91 37.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jana Nejedly #914 #64 488 1,625 49 105 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adriana Rikl Gersi Jana Nejedly
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1993 0–3 0.0% #328 1,462 0 0
20 1996 4–3 57.1% #99 1,543 0 0 1994 3–9 25.0% #139 1,467 0 0
21 1997 6–16 27.3% #92 1,494 0 0 1995 11–12 47.8% #82 1,580 0 0
22 1998 9–15 37.5% #63 1,543 0 0 1996 3–9 25.0% #130 1,552 0 0
23 1999 9–15 37.5% #77 1,545 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #137 1,541 0 0
24 2000 12–16 42.9% #68 1,558 0 0 1998 4–9 30.8% #75 1,556 0 0
25 2001 13–16 44.8% #73 1,594 0 1 1999 5–13 27.8% #88 1,496 0 0
26 2002 1–10 9.1% #348 1,486 0 1 2000 12–20 37.5% #69 1,528 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2001 8–17 32.0% #96 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2002 3–11 21.4% #233 1,423 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Adriana Rikl Gersi Jana Nejedly
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 22 42 64 34.4% 28 36 64 43.8% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 5 8 37.5% — 31 58 89 34.8% 8 22 30 26.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Adriana Rikl Gersi Jana Nejedly
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1463 89.4 — — — — +32 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — +0.21
20 1996 1544 113.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.1% +0.64 — — — +0.50 1994 1468 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 28.6% -1.54 2–2 (50%) — — +0.14
21 1997 1495 116.4 — — — — +50 +58 — 32.6% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 97.2 +0.69 1995 1580 127.6 — — — — -12 — — 49.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.69
22 1998 1544 116.8 — — — — +16 +17 +16 37.7% -0.96 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 102.3 -0.33 1996 1552 113.3 — — — — +10 — — 34.5% -1.14 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 95.3 -0.52
23 1999 1546 110.5 — — — — -41 +63 — 37.7% -0.74 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 1997 1541 109.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
24 2000 1559 109.6 — — — — -8 +53 — 38.6% -0.95 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 102.6 +0.30 1998 1556 109.7 — — — — +2 -49 — 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.14
25 2001 1594 115.4 — — — — -53 +84 — 43.3% -0.55 6–3 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 106.2 -0.28 1999 1496 102.5 — — — — +42 -14 — 27.5% -1.72 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.67
26 2002 1486 100.9 — — — — -14 +145 — 16.7% -2.08 0–2 — — +0.07 2000 1528 107.0 — — — — -2 -12 -40 36.5% -1.16 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.89
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1520 113.4 — — — — +22 -60 — 36.8% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.7 +0.87
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1423 84.2 — — — — +66 — — 23.3% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — +1.39
Career — 1644 116.3 — — — — -7 +66 +16 37.6% -0.89 20–15 (57%) 11–14 (44%) 106.3 +0.83 — 1625 113.2 — — — — +15 -29 -40 34.0% -1.19 21–21 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 101.1 +1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.