H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 0-3
Bettina Fulco holds a 3–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bettina Fulco leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1988 San Juan third round 6-4 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1988* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Bettina Fulco | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1988* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-2 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1987* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-0 6-1 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |