H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Beverly Bowes H2H: 1-0
Adriana Villagran Reami holds a 1–0 lead over Beverly Bowes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Adriana Villagran Reami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Adriana Villagran Reami won the 1984 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1984* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Adriana Villagran Reami | 6-1 6-3 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Beverly Bowes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |