H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Federica Bonsignori H2H: 1-1
Adriana Villagran Reami and Federica Bonsignori are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Federica Bonsignori won the 1988 Tampa third round 0-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1988* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Federica Bonsignori | 0-6 6-2 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1987* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Adriana Villagran Reami | 7-5 7-5 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Federica Bonsignori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |