H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-1
Adriana Villagran Reami and Helen Kelesi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on clay, while Adriana Villagran Reami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1988 Hilton Head third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1988* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 6-4 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1985* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Adriana Villagran Reami | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |