H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-3
Isabel Cueto holds a 3–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1989 Hilton Head second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1989* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-2 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1987* | Athens | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-1 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Isabel Cueto | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |