H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-1
Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1988 Rome third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1988* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 6-4 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |