H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-1
Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1987 Rome third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1987* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-2 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Mary Joe Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 |