H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0
Adriana Villagran Reami holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Adriana Villagran Reami leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Adriana Villagran Reami won the 1988 Aix En Provence second round 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1988* | Aix En Provence | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Adriana Villagran Reami | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |