H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-2
Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1990 Singapore second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1990* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-1 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1986* | Taipei | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |