H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-0
Adriana Villagran Reami holds a 1–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Adriana Villagran Reami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Adriana Villagran Reami won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Adriana Villagran Reami | 7-5 6-4 | Silke Meier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |