H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 0-1
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1986 San Juan third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1986* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-4 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |