H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Agnes Szavay vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 0-1
Anne Keothavong holds a 1–0 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Keothavong leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2009 Hobart third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2009* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anne Keothavong | 6-3 7-5 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,846 | 116 | 90 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnes Szavay | Anne Keothavong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #28 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,784 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |