H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Agnes Szavay vs Jill Craybas H2H: 1-0

Agnes Szavay holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnes Szavay leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnes Szavay won the 2011 Indian Wells Open round of 128 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnes Szavay
HUN Age 37 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Agnes Szavay #44 6-3 6-3 Jill Craybas #98 Match data Mar 11, 2011* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnes Szavay #1,023 #13 2,059 1,837 116 92 55.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnes Szavay Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 4–5 44.4% #186 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 1–2 33.3% #189 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 29–10 74.4% #20 1,816 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2008 26–25 51.0% #28 1,659 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2009 22–22 50.0% #39 1,710 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2010 30–19 61.2% #37 1,785 0 5 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2011 4–6 40.0% #259 1,721 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2012 0–3 0.0% #1015 1,659 0 5 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnes Szavay Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 15 4 19 78.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 16 21 23.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 8 15 23 34.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 51 94 45.7% 62 31 93 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnes Szavay Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1496 105.8 — — — — — +62 — 50.0% -0.35 0–2 — — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1482 92.2 — — — — — +61 — 37.5% -1.12 1–1 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1817 139.5 +3.34 +1.55 1.188 53.7% -85 -83 — 75.3% +1.84 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.5 +2.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1659 126.3 +0.68 +0.73 1.037 50.9% -68 +101 -7 50.4% +0.04 9–10 (47%) 8–6 (57%) 98.5 +2.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 1710 134.5 -0.66 +1.84 0.988 49.6% -134 +198 — 49.5% -0.23 8–9 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 100.3 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1786 142.5 +0.86 +3.56 1.125 52.6% -81 +154 -165 60.0% +0.90 12–8 (60%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 +0.13 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 2011 1721 117.3 -0.84 +0.06 0.990 49.6% -18 +145 — 50.0% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 1659 98.0 -1.90 -1.71 0.969 49.0% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.42 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1838 136.4 +0.73 +1.87 1.067 51.4% -89 +96 -75 56.0% +0.42 35–34 (51%) 20–20 (50%) 99.2 +3.25 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.