H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Agnes Szavay vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Amelia Island quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnes Szavay
HUN Age 37 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Davenport #30 6-4 7-6(3) Agnes Szavay #15 Match data Apr 12, 2008* QF Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnes Szavay #1,023 #13 2,059 1,837 116 92 55.8% 0 0 0 0 1 4 5
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnes Szavay Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 2005 4–5 44.4% #186 1,496 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0
17 2006 1–2 33.3% #189 1,481 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2007 29–10 74.4% #20 1,816 0 2 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3
19 2008 26–25 51.0% #28 1,659 0 2 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4
20 2009 22–22 50.0% #39 1,710 0 3 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7
21 2010 30–19 61.2% #37 1,785 0 5 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13
22 2011 4–6 40.0% #259 1,721 0 5 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19
23 2012 0–3 0.0% #1015 1,659 0 5 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26
24 — — — — — — — 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30
25 — — — — — — — 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37
26 — — — — — — — 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37
27 — — — — — — — 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38
28 — — — — — — — 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45
29 — — — — — — — 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51
30 — — — — — — — 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51
31 — — — — — — — 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53
32 — — — — — — — 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnes Szavay Lindsay Davenport
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2006 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 2007 15 4 19 78.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 2008 5 16 21 23.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2009 8 15 23 34.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9%
22 2011 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
23 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 43 51 94 45.7% 62 31 93 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnes Szavay Lindsay Davenport
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02
16 2005 1496 105.8 — — — — — +62 — 50.0% -0.35 0–2 — — +0.52 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26
17 2006 1482 92.2 — — — — — +61 — 37.5% -1.12 1–1 — — +0.25 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48
18 2007 1817 139.5 +3.34 +1.55 1.188 53.7% -85 -83 — 75.3% +1.84 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.5 +2.78 1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86
19 2008 1659 126.3 +0.68 +0.73 1.037 50.9% -68 +101 -7 50.4% +0.04 9–10 (47%) 8–6 (57%) 98.5 +2.79 1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77
20 2009 1710 134.5 -0.66 +1.84 0.988 49.6% -134 +198 — 49.5% -0.23 8–9 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 100.3 -0.22 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62
21 2010 1786 142.5 +0.86 +3.56 1.125 52.6% -81 +154 -165 60.0% +0.90 12–8 (60%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 +0.13 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58
22 2011 1721 117.3 -0.84 +0.06 0.990 49.6% -18 +145 — 50.0% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +0.02 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47
23 2012 1659 98.0 -1.90 -1.71 0.969 49.0% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.42 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18
Career — 1838 136.4 +0.73 +1.87 1.067 51.4% -89 +96 -75 56.0% +0.42 35–34 (51%) 20–20 (50%) 99.2 +3.25 — 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.