H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Agnes Szavay vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 2-1

Agnes Szavay holds a 2–1 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Agnes Szavay leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Agnes Szavay won the 2010 Budapest final 6-2 6-4.

HUN Age 37 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Agnes Szavay #49 6-2 6-4 Patty Schnyder #56 Match data Jul 11, 2010* F Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Patty Schnyder #48 5-2 (ret.) Agnes Szavay #33 Match data May 10, 2010 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Agnes Szavay #37 2-6 6-4 6-2 Patty Schnyder #21 Match data Jul 12, 2009* F Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnes Szavay — #13 2,059 1,838 116 92 55.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Patty Schnyder — #7 3,050 1,994 495 349 58.6% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnes Szavay Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 4–5 44.4% #186 1,496 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 2006 1–2 33.3% #189 1,481 0 0 1996 7–10 41.2% #64 1,586 0 0
18 2007 29–10 74.4% #20 1,817 0 2 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,709 0 0
19 2008 26–25 51.0% #28 1,659 0 2 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,911 0 5
20 2009 22–22 50.0% #39 1,710 0 3 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 2010 30–19 61.2% #37 1,786 0 5 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2011 4–6 40.0% #259 1,722 0 5 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2012 0–3 0.0% #1015 1,659 0 5 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 — — — — — — — 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,809 0 8
25 — — — — — — — 2004 33–23 58.9% #14 1,808 0 8
26 — — — — — — — 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,932 0 10
27 — — — — — — — 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,889 0 10
28 — — — — — — — 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,885 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2008 34–22 60.7% #14 1,821 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,754 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2011 3–9 25.0% — 1,668 0 11
37 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,632 0 11
38 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,628 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnes Szavay Patty Schnyder
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 2007 15 4 19 78.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2008 5 16 21 23.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1998 17 9 26 65.4% 27 6 33 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2009 8 15 23 34.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 16 10 26 61.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
21 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 15 11 26 57.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 2011 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 11 10 21 52.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 14 9 23 60.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 42 17 59 71.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 30 15 45 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 30 18 48 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 25 16 41 61.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 12 20 40.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 11 9 20 55.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 51 94 45.7% 62 31 93 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — 264 175 439 60.1% 188 120 308 61.0% 15 21 36 41.7% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnes Szavay Patty Schnyder
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1496 105.8 — — — — — +62 — 50.0% -0.35 0–2 — — +0.52 1995 1527 112.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — -0.07
17 2006 1482 92.2 — — — — — +61 — 37.5% -1.12 1–1 — — +0.25 1996 1586 120.2 — — — — -33 +52 — 40.5% -0.76 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 105.4 -0.06
18 2007 1817 139.6 +3.34 +1.55 1.188 53.7% -84 -82 — 75.3% +1.84 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.5 +2.81 1997 1710 151.6 — — — — -46 +9 — 50.0% +0.26 1–11 (8%) 4–5 (44%) 90.4 -0.80
19 2008 1660 126.7 +0.68 +0.73 1.037 50.9% -67 +100 -8 50.4% +0.04 9–10 (47%) 8–6 (57%) 98.6 +2.73 1998 1912 159.5 — — — — -71 +102 — 67.3% +1.24 15–11 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 109.8 -0.07
20 2009 1711 134.7 -0.66 +1.84 0.988 49.6% -133 +197 — 49.5% -0.23 8–9 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 100.3 -0.26 1999 1794 148.8 — — — — +33 +78 — 54.3% -0.08 13–12 (52%) 8–1 (89%) 102.0 -0.17
21 2010 1786 142.6 +0.86 +3.56 1.125 52.6% -80 +154 -164 60.0% +0.90 12–8 (60%) 2–7 (22%) 99.2 +0.11 2000 1751 142.6 — — — — +23 +53 -184 53.4% +0.31 11–8 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.05
22 2011 1722 117.4 -0.84 +0.06 0.990 49.6% -18 +145 — 50.0% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +0.02 2001 1735 129.7 — — — — -25 +32 -131 53.1% -0.08 7–14 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.1 +0.22
23 2012 1660 98.0 -1.90 -1.71 0.969 49.0% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.41 2002 1848 146.2 — — — — -30 -40 -257 53.7% +0.32 15–7 (68%) 10–5 (67%) 109.0 -1.16
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1810 143.5 +3.50 +0.33 1.160 53.0% +28 -43 — 51.4% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 +0.37
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1809 142.7 +3.52 +0.81 1.159 52.9% +2 +9 -222 59.7% +0.61 12–8 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +1.41
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1932 158.1 +2.86 +1.20 1.093 51.8% -18 +31 — 66.2% +1.20 19–17 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 99.0 +3.23
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1890 156.1 +3.89 +1.47 1.148 53.0% +35 +25 — 62.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 102.4 +1.42
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1886 151.5 +4.70 +1.91 1.163 53.3% -17 +90 -215 61.6% +1.02 13–13 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 94.4 +2.23
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1821 141.6 +3.54 +0.46 1.097 51.8% -3 +98 — 57.7% +0.47 11–9 (55%) 10–3 (77%) 102.4 +2.47
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1754 137.5 +1.61 -0.95 0.991 49.8% -10 +115 — 49.0% -0.07 7–5 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 103.6 -1.37
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1799 133.6 -0.01 -0.10 0.972 49.4% -35 +64 — 51.0% +0.09 12–2 (86%) 3–8 (27%) 104.3 -1.95
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1669 112.9 -2.14 -2.61 0.773 44.9% +66 +62 — 27.6% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.02
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1632 99.5 -0.77 +0.04 1.027 50.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1628 106.5 -0.85 -0.91 1.035 50.3% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.25
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1598 111.4 -1.17 -1.12 0.861 46.5% — +29 — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.22
Career — 1838 136.6 +0.73 +1.87 1.067 51.4% -88 +96 -75 56.0% +0.42 35–34 (51%) 20–20 (50%) 99.2 +3.20 — 1994 152.0 +2.71 +0.57 1.069 51.4% -7 +45 -201 56.6% +0.46 164–136 (55%) 110–75 (59%) 105.6 +0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.