H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Agnes Szavay vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 3-2

Agnes Szavay holds a 3–2 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Agnes Szavay leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Agnes Szavay won the 2009 Budapest round of 16 7-6(2) 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnes Szavay
HUN Age 37 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Agnes Szavay #37 7-6(2) 5-7 7-5 Tathiana Garbin #66 Match data Jul 10, 2009* R16 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tathiana Garbin #81 5-7 6-2 6-3 Agnes Szavay #16 Match data Aug 28, 2008* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Agnes Szavay #15 6-1 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #80 Match data Jun 25, 2008* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Agnes Szavay #20 6-3 4-6 6-2 Tathiana Garbin #39 Match data Feb 8, 2008* R16 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Tathiana Garbin #97 6-3 6-0 Agnes Szavay #301 Match data Jul 16, 2005* SF Modena Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnes Szavay #1,023 #13 2,059 1,837 116 92 55.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnes Szavay Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 4–5 44.4% #186 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 1–2 33.3% #189 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 29–10 74.4% #20 1,816 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2008 26–25 51.0% #28 1,659 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2009 22–22 50.0% #39 1,710 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2010 30–19 61.2% #37 1,785 0 5 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2011 4–6 40.0% #259 1,721 0 5 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2012 0–3 0.0% #1015 1,659 0 5 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnes Szavay Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 15 4 19 78.9% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 16 21 23.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 8 15 23 34.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2011 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 51 94 45.7% 62 31 93 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnes Szavay Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1496 105.8 — — — — — +62 — 50.0% -0.35 0–2 — — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1482 92.2 — — — — — +61 — 37.5% -1.12 1–1 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1817 139.5 +3.34 +1.55 1.188 53.7% -85 -83 — 75.3% +1.84 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.5 +2.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1659 126.3 +0.68 +0.73 1.037 50.9% -68 +101 -7 50.4% +0.04 9–10 (47%) 8–6 (57%) 98.5 +2.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 1710 134.5 -0.66 +1.84 0.988 49.6% -134 +198 — 49.5% -0.23 8–9 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 100.3 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1786 142.5 +0.86 +3.56 1.125 52.6% -81 +154 -165 60.0% +0.90 12–8 (60%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 +0.13 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2011 1721 117.3 -0.84 +0.06 0.990 49.6% -18 +145 — 50.0% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +0.02 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2012 1659 98.0 -1.90 -1.71 0.969 49.0% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.42 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
Career — 1838 136.4 +0.73 +1.87 1.067 51.4% -89 +96 -75 56.0% +0.42 35–34 (51%) 20–20 (50%) 99.2 +3.25 — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.