H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Agnes Szavay vs Vania King H2H: 0-1
Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2009 Monterrey fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2009* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Vania King | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,846 | 116 | 90 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnes Szavay | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #28 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,784 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |