H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-0

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2013 Sydney fourth round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 11, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-4 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #14 6-4 4-6 7-5 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17 — — — — — — —
27 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20 — — — — — — —
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20 — — — — — — —
29 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8