H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Olga Savchuk H2H: 3-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 3–0 lead over Olga Savchuk in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2015 Tianjin third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2015* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-0 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2010* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 6-1 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Olga Savchuk | #906 | #79 | 588 | 1,597 | 36 | 77 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Olga Savchuk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #285 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #150 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #196 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |