H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Camila Osorio H2H: 0-2
Camila Osorio holds a 2–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Camila Osorio leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2024 Beijing first round 1-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | Q2 | Grass | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-2 6-4 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2024* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 6-2 7-6(3) | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |