H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 02:15 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-1
Ajla Tomljanovic and Irina Falconi Hartman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2015 Indian Wells first round 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2015* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Irina Falconi Hartman | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Sep 11, 2014* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-4 6-1 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ajla Tomljanovic | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |