H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-2
Kiki Bertens holds a 2–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2019 Zhengzhou fourth round 6-4 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2019* | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-4 7-6(1) | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2018* | Seoul | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Kiki Bertens | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| May 30, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |