H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ajla Tomljanovic vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-2

Kiki Bertens holds a 2–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2019 Zhengzhou second round 6-4 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ajla Tomljanovic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ajla Tomljanovic #46 6-4 7-6(1) Kiki Bertens #8 Match data Sep 13, 2019* R16 Zhengzhou Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kiki Bertens #12 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 Ajla Tomljanovic #53 Match data Sep 23, 2018* F Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kiki Bertens #18 4-6 6-1 6-1 Ajla Tomljanovic #311 Match data May 30, 2017* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ajla Tomljanovic #103 #32 1,490 1,919 192 227 45.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Kiki Bertens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 0–1 0.0% #301 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 1–3 25.0% #164 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–5 16.7% #149 1,435 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 0–1 0.0% #493 1,420 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0
20 2013 7–7 50.0% #73 1,523 0 0 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1
21 2014 17–20 45.9% #63 1,587 0 0 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1
22 2015 18–21 46.2% #65 1,604 0 0 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1
23 2016 0–2 0.0% #929 1,581 0 0 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1
24 2017 5–10 33.3% #136 1,571 0 0 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2
25 2018 22–19 53.7% #46 1,713 0 0 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5
26 2019 25–29 46.3% #51 1,653 0 0 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8
27 2020 5–11 31.2% #68 1,615 0 0 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10
28 2021 24–22 52.2% #45 1,778 0 0 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11
29 2022 28–24 53.8% #33 1,867 0 0 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11
30 2023 1–2 33.3% #290 1,847 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2024 9–15 37.5% #109 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2025 17–22 43.6% #80 1,768 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2026 12–13 48.0% #103 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Kiki Bertens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2013 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2014 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
22 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2017 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
28 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2022 14 15 29 48.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 11 14 25 44.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 8 5 13 61.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 118 142 260 45.4% 45 57 102 44.1% 29 28 57 50.9% — — — — — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 388/420 of Ajla Tomljanovic's and 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Kiki Bertens
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 1/1 1.0 7.0 58.7% 61.4% 35.5% 50.0% 66.7% 50.7% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 4/4 2.5 4.3 56.4% 63.8% 45.0% 54.7% 49.3% 55.4% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6/6 3.0 4.7 56.9% 62.3% 39.8% 53.5% 54.9% 52.7% 48.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1/1 0.0 8.0 54.2% 53.8% 27.3% 25.0% 44.4% 41.7% 42.6% 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9%
20 2013 11/14 4.5 4.5 56.5% 64.4% 45.5% 54.6% 49.4% 56.3% 44.4% 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3%
21 2014 32/37 4.2 4.3 56.7% 68.6% 43.3% 54.3% 46.9% 57.7% 41.4% 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7%
22 2015 33/39 4.1 4.3 62.9% 64.1% 48.0% 47.9% 47.0% 58.1% 39.9% 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8%
23 2016 2/2 2.0 5.0 54.1% 51.0% 30.3% 57.2% 70.8% 41.5% 43.0% 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8%
24 2017 15/15 2.1 5.7 58.1% 61.2% 36.9% 45.7% 39.5% 50.7% 41.8% 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0%
25 2018 41/41 3.4 4.9 58.4% 64.1% 43.8% 46.4% 51.9% 55.6% 44.1% 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9%
26 2019 53/54 3.5 4.3 57.9% 66.8% 41.5% 49.1% 46.9% 56.3% 44.0% 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8%
27 2020 16/16 3.3 4.3 55.0% 64.8% 46.2% 48.0% 40.7% 56.3% 40.8% 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6%
28 2021 44/46 2.5 4.0 61.8% 64.4% 45.8% 55.9% 46.4% 57.2% 43.6% 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0%
29 2022 52/52 2.6 4.2 62.5% 64.6% 43.8% 48.1% 52.0% 56.8% 44.1% 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9%
30 2023 2/3 3.0 5.0 65.3% 62.9% 47.1% 43.8% 48.0% 57.5% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 22/24 2.9 7.5 64.1% 62.8% 38.0% 50.7% 40.5% 53.9% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 28/39 2.2 5.6 65.8% 61.9% 42.1% 49.1% 51.2% 55.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 25/26 1.9 5.7 67.2% 63.3% 44.0% 54.1% 53.1% 56.9% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 388/420 3.0 4.8 60.7% 64.4% 43.3% 50.2% 48.3% 56.1% 43.1% — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Kiki Bertens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2009 1484 97.7 -3.11 -1.39 0.579 41.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1465 98.9 -2.42 -2.23 0.863 47.3% +22 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1436 104.6 -1.59 +0.58 1.019 50.4% +18 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1421 96.4 -2.81 -3.22 0.731 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13
20 2013 1524 117.9 -0.54 -0.01 1.015 50.1% +16 — +14 50.0% -0.21 3–5 (38%) 3–0 (100%) — 0.00 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87
21 2014 1588 121.5 +0.93 -1.84 0.978 49.5% -16 +10 — 48.2% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 102.5 +0.94 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04
22 2015 1605 119.3 -0.59 -1.44 0.953 49.0% -12 +8 -87 45.1% -0.46 8–5 (62%) 12–3 (80%) 109.7 +0.57 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24
23 2016 1581 102.8 -1.21 +0.88 0.734 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.07 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23
24 2017 1571 112.5 -3.75 +0.50 0.848 46.2% +16 -10 — 42.4% -0.94 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.62 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68
25 2018 1714 128.3 -0.28 +0.61 0.992 49.8% -20 -131 -150 51.0% +0.03 12–8 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 103.1 -0.62 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57
26 2019 1654 138.3 -0.07 +1.07 1.005 50.1% +8 -20 -47 50.0% +0.06 6–12 (33%) 6–11 (35%) 94.0 -0.88 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83
27 2020 1615 130.7 +0.18 -1.12 0.935 48.5% +33 -43 — 36.8% -0.79 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.6 -0.53 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54
28 2021 1779 141.3 +0.91 +0.76 1.019 50.3% -67 -93 -32 52.0% +0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 103.3 -0.37 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01
29 2022 1867 144.0 +0.10 +1.33 1.021 50.4% -31 -149 -23 53.0% +0.16 10–9 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 101.7 -1.02 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66
30 2023 1848 99.8 -0.66 +1.44 1.016 50.2% -57 — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1792 122.8 -1.50 -0.80 0.920 48.1% -16 -35 +106 41.1% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.2 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1769 134.0 -0.96 +0.30 0.968 49.2% -15 -12 +78 46.2% -0.34 8–9 (47%) 9–1 (90%) 104.4 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1715 134.5 -0.15 +1.20 1.055 51.2% +100 -103 +129 50.0% +0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 96.0 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1919 136.5 -0.29 +0.21 0.982 49.6% -8 -55 -5 47.6% -0.20 75–88 (46%) 63–57 (53%) 103.1 -0.82 — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.