H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Akemi Nishiya vs Renata Baranski H2H: 1-0

Akemi Nishiya holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Baranski in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akemi Nishiya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akemi Nishiya won the 1988 Schenectady round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Akemi Nishiya
JPN Age 61
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Renata Baranski
POL Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akemi Nishiya 6-3 6-3 Renata Baranski Match data Jul 22, 1988* R16 Schenectady WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Akemi Nishiya — — — 1,537 10 30 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Renata Baranski — — — 1,543 19 45 29.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Akemi Nishiya Renata Baranski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,432 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,412 0 0 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,473 0 0
23 1988 5–6 45.5% — 1,460 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% — 1,461 0 0
24 1989 5–10 33.3% — 1,480 0 0 1989 7–10 41.2% — 1,513 0 0
25 1990 0–4 0.0% — 1,450 0 0 1990 6–14 30.0% — 1,514 0 0
26 1991 0–3 0.0% — 1,419 0 0 1991 4–15 21.1% — 1,430 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Akemi Nishiya Renata Baranski
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 9 19 28 32.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 14 28 42 33.3% 3 11 14 21.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Akemi Nishiya Renata Baranski
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1985 1438 92.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1432 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1412 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.15 1987 1474 98.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.13
23 1988 1461 102.7 — — — — +69 — — 48.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.90 1988 1461 102.3 — — — — +32 — — 30.8% -0.77 1–0 — — +0.82
24 1989 1480 111.9 — — — — +60 — — 31.3% -1.63 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.75 1989 1513 111.1 — — — — +31 — — 43.6% -0.38 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.27
25 1990 1450 101.2 — — — — +48 — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — -0.12 1990 1515 108.3 — — — — +48 -40 +50 36.2% -1.57 2–5 (29%) 1–0 — +0.16
26 1991 1419 96.0 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.19 1991 1430 91.6 — — — — +32 +13 — 24.4% -1.90 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 +1.48
Career — 1537 102.9 — — — — +62 — — 29.2% -1.62 3–8 (27%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +4.75 — 1543 103.9 — — — — +36 -9 +50 33.8% -1.29 6–13 (32%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +6.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.