H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Akgul Amanmuradova vs Laura Robson H2H: 1-0

Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Robson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2012 Pattaya round of 32 5-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Robson
Great Britain Age 32 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akgul Amanmuradova #107 5-2 (ret.) Laura Robson #118 Match data Feb 9, 2012* R32 Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laura Robson #764 #27 1,685 1,710 39 63 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Laura Robson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #517 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #403 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2010 1–5 16.7% #217 1,474 0 0
17 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 2011 3–5 37.5% #133 1,508 0 0
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0 2012 16–15 51.6% #53 1,657 0 0
19 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0 2013 18–22 45.0% #44 1,661 0 0
20 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0 2014 0–2 0.0% #916 1,630 0 0
21 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0 2015 0–2 0.0% #557 1,594 0 0
22 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0 2016 1–8 11.1% #222 1,512 0 0
23 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
24 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Laura Robson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
17 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 10 13 23 43.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — 22 33 55 40.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 18 27 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's and 95/101 of Laura Robson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Laura Robson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 10.0 14.0 59.6% 66.1% 42.1% 61.5% 50.0% 56.4% 37.8%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 4.7 4.0 63.7% 69.3% 38.8% 68.2% 31.9% 58.6% 30.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 8/8 2.4 5.8 54.8% 65.8% 40.9% 41.9% 43.5% 54.4% 42.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/31 4.2 5.8 57.1% 68.1% 44.4% 51.4% 44.3% 57.9% 43.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 37/40 4.5 5.8 55.6% 69.7% 43.4% 54.0% 44.4% 58.0% 42.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 4.0 3.5 59.1% 55.8% 36.7% 41.7% 50.0% 47.7% 34.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 2/2 5.0 11.0 57.6% 68.6% 35.7% 66.4% 34.1% 54.9% 38.1%
22 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6% 2016 9/9 2.8 5.3 56.5% 58.2% 41.5% 51.8% 36.2% 51.0% 38.0%
23 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7% 2017 2/2 2.5 4.5 58.7% 66.8% 43.5% 21.4% 3.6% 57.1% 34.4%
24 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3% — 95/102 4.1 5.8 56.8% 67.4% 42.7% 52.3% 41.8% 56.8% 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Akgul Amanmuradova Laura Robson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1490 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.05
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1484 103.3 -0.52 +0.53 0.867 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1474 102.2 +0.56 -5.19 0.742 45.8% — — +98 0.0% -2.40 — 0–1 — -0.50
17 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 2011 1508 110.8 +0.58 -0.57 0.932 48.6% +1 — +42 26.7% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.08
18 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07 2012 1658 135.1 +1.17 +0.07 1.034 51.0% -32 -64 -60 52.2% +0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.14
19 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15 2013 1662 129.1 +1.89 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -53 -51 -31 46.2% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 96.6 -0.17
20 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 2014 1630 100.1 -4.77 -2.42 0.663 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.11
21 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89 2015 1595 101.1 -0.86 -1.36 0.846 46.6% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.19
22 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12 2016 1512 105.4 -2.56 -1.79 0.776 45.0% +6 +50 — 15.8% -2.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
23 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.9 +0.73 2017 1465 96.8 -2.08 -0.78 0.802 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.18
24 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 99.4 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.6 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.5 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.70 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65 — 1710 126.6 +0.75 -0.88 0.952 49.1% -36 -35 -6 39.8% -0.43 11–16 (41%) 9–18 (33%) 96.1 -0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.