H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Angelique Widjaja H2H: 0-1
Angelique Widjaja holds a 1–0 lead over Akiko Morigami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelique Widjaja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelique Widjaja won the 2003 Indian Wells first round 5-7 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
INA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Angelique Widjaja | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Angelique Widjaja | #513 | #55 | 635 | 1,669 | 38 | 45 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Angelique Widjaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #147 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #139 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |