H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 0-1
Iroda Tulyaganova holds a 1–0 lead over Akiko Morigami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iroda Tulyaganova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iroda Tulyaganova won the 2003 Hyderabad semifinal 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2003* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Iroda Tulyaganova | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |