H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Akiko Morigami vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 1-1
Akiko Morigami and Iveta Benesova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2007 Prague third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2007* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Akiko Morigami | 6-3 6-2 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
| Apr 4, 2007* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Iveta Benesova | 6-1 7-6(4) | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Akiko Morigami | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |