H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alberta Brianti vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Dechy holds a 1–0 lead over Alberta Brianti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2007 Birmingham round of 64 6-3 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alberta Brianti
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Dechy #46 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Alberta Brianti #102 Match data Jun 13, 2007* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alberta Brianti #908 #55 1,066 1,634 53 93 36.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,918 293 272 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alberta Brianti Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,606 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,788 0 0
21 2001 0–1 0.0% #284 1,484 0 0 2000 30–20 60.0% #26 1,792 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,629 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,840 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2004 33–24 57.9% #21 1,809 0 1
26 2006 3–4 42.9% #99 1,488 0 0 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,797 0 1
27 2007 3–15 16.7% #154 1,399 0 0 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,648 0 1
28 2008 0–3 0.0% #173 1,368 0 0 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2009 9–10 47.4% #73 1,501 0 0 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2010 9–20 31.0% #91 1,479 0 0 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,580 0 1
31 2011 20–22 47.6% #70 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2012 9–16 36.0% #134 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #208 1,507 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2015 0–1 0.0% #310 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alberta Brianti Nathalie Dechy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 7 20 65.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2007 1 8 9 11.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 8 15 23 34.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2009 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2011 11 15 26 42.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 54 88 38.6% 18 28 46 39.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — 160 145 305 52.5% 71 66 137 51.8% 34 33 67 50.7% 28 28 56 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 127/145 of Alberta Brianti's and 132/292 of Nathalie Dechy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alberta Brianti Nathalie Dechy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/49 1.7 4.9 64.0% 63.0% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 58.4% 50.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 8/57 1.9 3.4 68.4% 60.9% 50.1% 65.8% 62.3% 56.9% 44.5%
26 2006 2/7 1.5 2.0 65.9% 59.9% 43.3% 27.8% 29.2% 54.0% 38.4% 2005 18/66 1.4 3.2 69.7% 61.9% 48.5% 60.7% 55.8% 57.5% 44.6%
27 2007 12/18 1.6 3.9 62.5% 56.2% 39.2% 43.8% 31.7% 49.6% 38.5% 2006 31/41 1.6 2.8 72.6% 60.3% 44.3% 54.0% 44.4% 55.9% 42.0%
28 2008 2/3 2.5 4.0 64.0% 50.9% 39.2% 28.8% 22.2% 46.9% 34.6% 2007 27/35 1.1 3.0 72.8% 56.7% 43.7% 46.8% 46.2% 53.3% 42.4%
29 2009 19/19 1.1 3.4 63.0% 58.0% 46.2% 55.8% 52.7% 54.2% 44.7% 2008 26/29 1.7 4.7 64.9% 59.5% 41.5% 48.8% 54.7% 53.0% 43.2%
30 2010 28/29 0.4 3.0 66.2% 58.5% 43.7% 46.2% 42.1% 53.4% 42.1% 2009 15/15 1.3 3.5 68.6% 58.7% 41.0% 48.6% 48.4% 53.2% 39.3%
31 2011 38/42 1.0 3.7 59.6% 58.4% 43.3% 51.6% 45.5% 52.2% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 24/25 1.2 3.7 63.0% 58.5% 41.5% 49.7% 45.7% 52.4% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 55.0% 48.5% 44.4% 45.5% 66.7% 46.7% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1/1 2.0 1.0 61.7% 45.9% 52.2% 28.6% 60.0% 48.3% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alberta Brianti Nathalie Dechy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1481 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1501 112.9 — — — — +19 +53 — 38.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.56
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1540 124.8 — — — — -7 +9 — 42.9% -0.29 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.35
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1607 125.9 — — — — -40 -52 +18 42.2% -0.42 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 +0.60
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1788 147.7 — — — — -63 -117 -80 55.1% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 108.9 -1.15
21 2001 1485 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09 2000 1792 145.6 — — — — -2 -103 -48 58.7% +0.61 9–6 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 101.9 -1.62
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1629 124.7 — — — — +13 +69 +76 48.6% -0.06 7–12 (37%) 5–5 (50%) 93.7 -0.20
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1770 144.3 — — — — -37 +23 -68 56.2% +0.35 14–11 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 105.9 -0.89
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1840 138.9 +1.35 +3.00 1.221 54.2% -60 +48 -96 58.5% +0.48 12–2 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 108.2 -0.85
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1810 147.7 +1.35 +0.63 1.034 51.1% +6 +3 -86 57.9% +0.62 7–9 (44%) 6–8 (43%) 95.0 -1.40
26 2006 1489 106.1 +0.07 -1.35 0.836 45.8% +31 — — 37.5% -0.19 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.75 2005 1798 146.1 +1.56 +0.35 1.048 51.3% +22 -36 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–6 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 98.9 +1.39
27 2007 1400 90.7 -3.87 -3.41 0.763 44.2% +46 +70 — 12.5% -2.66 — — — -0.08 2006 1648 128.2 +0.04 -1.40 0.952 49.0% -1 +72 +148 42.7% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 92.6 +0.62
28 2008 1368 90.9 -1.21 -2.01 0.652 40.1% — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 2007 1651 130.6 -1.46 -0.89 0.907 47.9% -3 +66 +97 45.6% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–8 (33%) 95.8 -1.91
29 2009 1502 117.0 -0.75 +0.28 0.976 49.6% +34 -48 — 47.4% -0.32 0–2 2–0 — +0.79 2008 1671 130.8 -1.57 -0.33 0.919 48.2% +12 -28 +59 45.5% -0.24 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -1.85
30 2010 1480 113.4 -2.07 -1.21 0.903 47.7% +31 -15 +38 34.3% -1.01 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 100.4 +0.17 2009 1581 108.4 -1.61 -3.48 0.839 46.8% +48 +1 +106 32.4% -1.11 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 -0.41
31 2011 1600 122.5 -2.50 -0.67 0.912 48.0% -17 -24 — 45.4% -0.52 9–6 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 1523 103.6 -2.67 -1.56 0.893 47.6% +17 +22 — 41.3% -0.57 5–8 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1508 96.7 -2.15 -0.47 0.689 42.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1497 98.3 -1.23 -1.76 0.619 40.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1635 112.1 -2.23 -1.11 0.891 47.5% +16 +1 +38 37.4% -0.88 20–22 (48%) 10–10 (50%) 102.2 +1.37 — 1919 143.2 -0.42 -0.73 0.953 49.1% -9 0 -6 51.4% +0.13 98–90 (52%) 60–67 (47%) 96.4 -1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.