H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alberta Brianti vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1

Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Alberta Brianti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2012 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-4 0-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alberta Brianti
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-4 0-6 6-4 Alberta Brianti #103 Match data May 24, 2012* R32 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alberta Brianti #908 #55 1,066 1,634 53 93 36.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alberta Brianti Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2001 0–1 0.0% #284 1,484 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2006 3–4 42.9% #99 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2007 3–15 16.7% #154 1,399 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2008 0–3 0.0% #173 1,368 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2009 9–10 47.4% #73 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2010 9–20 31.0% #91 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2011 20–22 47.6% #70 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2012 9–16 36.0% #134 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #208 1,507 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2015 0–1 0.0% #310 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alberta Brianti Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1 8 9 11.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 11 15 26 42.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 54 88 38.6% 18 28 46 39.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alberta Brianti Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2001 1485 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2006 1489 106.1 +0.07 -1.35 0.836 45.8% +31 — — 37.5% -0.19 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1400 90.7 -3.87 -3.41 0.763 44.2% +46 +70 — 12.5% -2.66 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 1368 90.9 -1.21 -2.01 0.652 40.1% — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1502 117.0 -0.75 +0.28 0.976 49.6% +34 -48 — 47.4% -0.32 0–2 2–0 — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 1480 113.4 -2.07 -1.21 0.903 47.7% +31 -15 +38 34.3% -1.01 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 100.4 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 1600 122.5 -2.50 -0.67 0.912 48.0% -17 -24 — 45.4% -0.52 9–6 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 1523 103.6 -2.67 -1.56 0.893 47.6% +17 +22 — 41.3% -0.57 5–8 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1508 96.7 -2.15 -0.47 0.689 42.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1497 98.3 -1.23 -1.76 0.619 40.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1635 112.1 -2.23 -1.11 0.891 47.5% +16 +1 +38 37.4% -0.88 20–22 (48%) 10–10 (50%) 102.2 +1.37 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.