H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Aleksandra Wozniak vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-1
Aleksandra Wozniak and Catalina Castano are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Aleksandra Wozniak won the 2010 Charleston third round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Catalina Castano | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2005* | Bogota | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Catalina Castano | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aleksandra Wozniak | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |