H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Aleksandra Wozniak vs Julia Vakulenko H2H: 1-0
Aleksandra Wozniak holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Vakulenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Wozniak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Wozniak won the 2008 Cincinnati fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2008* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-2 6-3 | Julia Vakulenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Julia Vakulenko | #979 | #31 | 916 | 1,730 | 51 | 76 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aleksandra Wozniak | Julia Vakulenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #132 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #132 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #130 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #354 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #156 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |