H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Aleksandra Wozniak vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-1

Aleksandra Wozniak and Lilia Osterloh are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aleksandra Wozniak leads 1–0 on clay, while Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Wozniak won the 2010 Charleston Open first round 6-3 7-6(9).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Aleksandra Wozniak
Canada Age 39 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aleksandra Wozniak #44 6-3 7-6(9) Lilia Osterloh #125 Match data Apr 14, 2010* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Lilia Osterloh #121 6-3 6-2 Aleksandra Wozniak #131 Match data Nov 4, 2006* QF Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Aleksandra Wozniak #1,042 #21 2,114 1,793 103 129 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aleksandra Wozniak Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2004 0–1 0.0% #492 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2005 0–3 0.0% #168 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2006 3–5 37.5% #93 1,467 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2007 8–16 33.3% #136 1,477 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 2008 19–15 55.9% #34 1,677 0 1 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2009 30–25 54.5% #34 1,767 0 1 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2010 11–18 37.9% #125 1,602 0 1 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 2011 4–7 36.4% #107 1,582 0 1 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 2012 19–17 52.8% #43 1,718 0 1 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2013 2–7 22.2% #288 1,652 0 1 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 2014 7–10 41.2% #130 1,618 0 1 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2016 0–4 0.0% #301 1,533 0 1 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2017 0–1 0.0% #300 1,506 0 1 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Aleksandra Wozniak Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 4 12 16 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 16 10 26 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2009 16 15 31 51.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2012 10 9 19 52.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 62 85 147 42.2% 29 29 58 50.0% 12 15 27 44.4% — — — — — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/228 of Aleksandra Wozniak's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Aleksandra Wozniak Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2006 1/8 4.0 5.0 64.0% 56.3% 33.3% 40.0% 25.0% 48.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 13/24 2.1 4.5 53.3% 60.8% 39.2% 52.6% 41.4% 50.7% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 28/34 2.3 4.0 61.3% 62.9% 43.8% 55.7% 49.5% 55.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 52/55 2.5 3.8 59.7% 63.7% 48.1% 51.3% 55.3% 57.4% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 28/29 2.0 3.5 65.3% 59.1% 40.1% 52.1% 44.8% 52.6% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 11/11 1.9 2.9 66.2% 65.9% 46.5% 59.1% 38.8% 59.5% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 32/36 2.4 3.8 62.5% 63.4% 45.3% 51.3% 51.2% 56.5% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 8/9 1.3 6.8 59.5% 54.2% 37.3% 50.4% 55.7% 47.4% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 16/17 2.2 4.3 57.2% 62.5% 40.9% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 2016 3/4 0.7 7.0 69.1% 49.9% 33.5% 52.2% 41.7% 44.8% 40.0% 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 2017 1/1 1.0 5.0 59.7% 53.5% 44.8% 40.0% 60.0% 50.0% 34.5% 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
Career — 193/232 2.2 4.0 61.1% 62.0% 43.8% 52.4% 49.2% 54.9% 44.3% — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aleksandra Wozniak Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2004 1491 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 1459 102.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 0–2 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1468 109.8 -1.51 -0.76 0.821 45.3% +29 — — 44.4% +0.11 0–2 — — +0.28 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 2007 1478 107.0 -3.54 -2.63 0.826 45.9% -1 +74 — 28.6% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 0–6 (0%) 97.3 +0.24 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 2008 1678 129.2 +0.51 -0.06 0.972 49.4% -2 -141 — 50.7% -0.11 7–2 (78%) 0–4 (0%) 104.2 +0.05 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 2009 1767 133.0 +1.75 +2.32 1.085 51.8% -39 -118 -131 52.4% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 104.9 -0.33 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 2010 1602 108.4 -2.85 -1.60 0.875 47.2% -5 +46 +21 37.7% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.7 +0.69 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 2011 1582 124.8 +1.18 +1.26 1.118 52.3% +3 — — 41.7% +0.29 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.06 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 2012 1719 135.4 +0.10 +1.88 1.064 51.3% -42 -27 -81 54.8% +0.39 6–8 (43%) 8–4 (67%) 104.6 -0.14 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2013 1652 121.8 -3.37 +0.90 0.842 46.2% -33 — — 25.0% -1.45 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.66 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 2014 1619 118.6 -2.20 +0.51 0.965 48.9% -3 — +19 40.5% -0.69 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -0.26 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2016 1533 94.9 -2.12 -2.18 0.725 42.5% +3 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.39 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2017 1507 92.2 -3.22 -0.52 0.690 43.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.07 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1793 127.8 -0.40 +0.63 0.983 49.6% -16 -41 -56 44.2% -0.35 34–36 (49%) 27–29 (48%) 102.3 +0.12 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.