H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Elena Bovina H2H: 0-2
Elena Bovina holds a 2–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2003 Zurich third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2003* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-4 6-1 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2003* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-3 7-6(4) | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Elena Bovina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |