H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 0-1
Iroda Tulyaganova holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iroda Tulyaganova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iroda Tulyaganova won the 2003 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Iroda Tulyaganova | 3-6 6-4 (ret.) | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |