H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Jamea Jackson H2H: 0-1

Jamea Jackson holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jamea Jackson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamea Jackson won the 2006 Japan Women's Open round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jamea Jackson
USA Age 40 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jamea Jackson #61 6-3 6-1 Alicia Molik #180 Match data Oct 6, 2006* R16 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Jamea Jackson #382 #43 479 1,662 33 50 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Jamea Jackson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #444 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 2–5 28.6% #156 1,482 0 0
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 2005 10–14 41.7% #80 1,520 0 0
19 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0 2006 19–19 50.0% #45 1,608 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 2007 0–6 0.0% #588 1,539 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 2008 2–5 28.6% #273 1,529 0 0
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alicia Molik Jamea Jackson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
20 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — 20 37 57 35.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alicia Molik Jamea Jackson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1492 100.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1483 106.1 -0.74 -0.28 0.892 47.5% -1 — — 46.7% -0.07 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.03
18 1999 1538 124.1 — — — — +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) — — -0.37 2005 1521 117.6 -0.08 -0.13 1.020 50.4% -39 — +118 43.6% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.8 -0.78
19 2000 1545 115.2 — — — — +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44 2006 1609 128.7 -0.56 +0.41 1.005 50.0% -63 -80 +192 53.5% +0.27 6–8 (43%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.35
20 2001 1614 121.4 — — — — -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43 2007 1540 95.2 -4.69 -3.50 0.583 38.5% -33 — — 7.7% -3.54 0–1 — — -0.44
21 2002 1569 124.5 — — — — -14 -45 — 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20 2008 1530 101.3 -3.99 -0.29 0.755 43.5% -25 — — 28.6% -2.21 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
22 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 — — 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 — 14.3% -2.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 — +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 — — 44.4% -1.44 1–0 — — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34 — 1662 120.0 -1.40 -0.31 0.907 47.8% -44 -80 +164 44.3% -0.45 9–18 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 96.4 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.