H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Mireille Dittmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2001 Shanghai round of 32 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | 7-5 7-6(3) | Mireille Dittmann | Match data | Oct 11, 2001* | R32 | Shanghai | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,060 | 156 | 164 | 48.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Mireille Dittmann | #804 | #197 | 148 | 1,500 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Mireille Dittmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 1,977 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #308 | 1,567 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Mireille Dittmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1999 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 32 | 10 | 42 | 76.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 115 | 106 | 221 | 52.0% | 24 | 33 | 57 | 42.1% | 17 | 22 | 39 | 43.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Mireille Dittmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1538 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +32 | +39 | 40.0% | -0.67 | 3–4 (43%) | — | — | -0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 1545 | 115.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -19 | +28 | 40.5% | -0.76 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | 97.1 | -0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 1614 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -100 | +81 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 5–7 (42%) | 8–4 (67%) | 106.1 | +0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 1569 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -45 | — | 40.9% | -0.48 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–3 (50%) | 93.3 | -1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 1706 | 136.1 | +3.00 | -2.49 | 0.999 | 50.8% | -34 | -56 | -42 | 59.1% | +0.82 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | 105.1 | -0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 1978 | 154.9 | +4.02 | +1.09 | 1.244 | 53.8% | -4 | -279 | -302 | 66.4% | +1.05 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–6 (57%) | 104.1 | -3.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 1796 | 147.3 | +4.13 | -2.25 | 1.007 | 50.9% | +36 | — | — | 55.9% | +0.43 | 4–4 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | 98.0 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 1641 | 108.0 | -1.66 | -3.77 | 0.719 | 43.4% | +48 | +8 | -24 | 33.3% | -1.29 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.8 | -0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 1636 | 131.0 | +2.14 | -5.78 | 0.884 | 47.8% | +52 | -31 | -15 | 45.5% | -0.23 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–5 (44%) | 99.9 | -1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 1568 | 101.1 | -1.44 | -2.86 | 0.773 | 45.3% | +84 | -29 | — | 14.3% | -2.36 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.12 | 2001 | 1472 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.13 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1465 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| 29 | 2010 | 1557 | 118.1 | -1.04 | -3.67 | 0.876 | 47.8% | +57 | — | +39 | 41.7% | -0.54 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.8 | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 1582 | 106.7 | -1.46 | -2.46 | 0.726 | 43.7% | +48 | — | — | 44.4% | -1.44 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2061 | 138.9 | +1.10 | -3.69 | 0.889 | 48.0% | +13 | -83 | -42 | 49.9% | -0.02 | 46–53 (46%) | 40–40 (50%) | 99.4 | -2.34 | — | 1500 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 25, 2010 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 3, 2005 | H2H |
| Silvia Farina Elia | 4 | 2 | 6 | Oct 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 13, 2010 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kournikova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 12, 2002 | H2H |
| Alicia Molik | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 27, 2001 | H2H |