H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 2-0
Alicia Molik holds a 2–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2007 Australian Open first round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alicia Molik | 6-2 7-6(4) | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Alicia Molik | 7-5 6-1 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alicia Molik | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |