H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alisa Kleybanova vs Agnes Szavay H2H: 3-0
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 3–0 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alisa Kleybanova leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2011 Indian Wells second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2011* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-3 7-5 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2010* | Seoul | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-3 6-2 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2008* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-2 6-3 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,846 | 116 | 90 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alisa Kleybanova | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #28 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,784 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |