H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alisa Kleybanova vs Jelena Kostanic Tosic H2H: 1-0
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2004 Indian Wells first round 2-6 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 2-6 6-0 7-5 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alisa Kleybanova | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |