H2H data updated: 2026-09-24 00:00 UTC

Alisa Kleybanova vs Kimiko Date H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date holds a 1–0 lead over Alisa Kleybanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2009 Korea Open second round 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alisa Kleybanova
Russia Age 37 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #155 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Alisa Kleybanova #30 Match data Sep 25, 2009* R16 Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alisa Kleybanova #784 #20 2,485 1,877 108 92 54.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alisa Kleybanova Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2004 1–1 50.0% #368 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2005 0–1 0.0% #237 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 0–2 0.0% #240 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 17–16 51.5% #32 1,646 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2009 31–24 56.4% #29 1,780 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2010 32–23 58.2% #25 1,828 0 2 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0
21 2011 14–12 53.8% #68 1,780 0 2 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #545 1,777 0 2 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2
23 2013 4–4 50.0% #188 1,770 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2014 8–8 50.0% #139 1,771 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5
25 — — — — — — — 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alisa Kleybanova Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2009 22 16 38 57.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 25 16 41 61.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2013 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2014 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 61 138 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alisa Kleybanova Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2004 1514 101.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 1499 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1473 97.0 -1.84 -0.90 0.854 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1647 137.2 +0.59 +0.97 1.026 50.5% -43 -112 +90 50.0% +0.24 7–3 (70%) 0–3 (0%) 103.5 -0.20 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20
19 2009 1781 141.6 +1.51 +0.24 1.040 50.9% -6 -169 -80 56.4% +0.35 10–13 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.3 +2.38 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03
20 2010 1828 151.3 +2.66 +0.90 1.067 51.6% +4 -191 -99 56.8% +0.62 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 96.7 -1.00 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73
21 2011 1780 142.2 +1.00 +1.86 1.072 51.5% +40 -131 — 53.3% +0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.66 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72
22 2012 1777 108.2 -0.89 -1.44 0.834 48.0% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.25 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46
23 2013 1770 112.0 -1.63 +0.12 0.852 46.4% +18 — — 42.1% -1.16 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -0.13 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33
24 2014 1772 126.6 +0.26 +0.71 0.947 49.3% +40 -113 — 50.0% -0.23 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.87 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42
27 2017 1764 109.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16
Career — 1878 145.8 +1.33 +0.77 1.030 50.7% +3 -147 0 53.0% +0.27 35–28 (56%) 16–23 (41%) 99.6 -0.40 — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.