H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alisa Kleybanova vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Alisa Kleybanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 US Open second round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alisa Kleybanova
Russia Age 37 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Davenport #24 7-5 6-3 Alisa Kleybanova #34 Match data Aug 28, 2008* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alisa Kleybanova #784 #20 2,485 1,877 108 92 54.0% 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alisa Kleybanova Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2004 1–1 50.0% #368 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2005 0–1 0.0% #237 1,499 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 2006 0–2 0.0% #240 1,472 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2008 17–16 51.5% #32 1,646 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3
19 2009 31–24 56.4% #29 1,780 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4
20 2010 32–23 58.2% #25 1,828 0 2 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7
21 2011 14–12 53.8% #68 1,780 0 2 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #545 1,777 0 2 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19
23 2013 4–4 50.0% #188 1,770 0 2 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26
24 2014 8–8 50.0% #139 1,771 0 2 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30
25 — — — — — — — 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37
26 — — — — — — — 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37
27 — — — — — — — 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38
28 — — — — — — — 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45
29 — — — — — — — 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51
30 — — — — — — — 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51
31 — — — — — — — 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53
32 — — — — — — — 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alisa Kleybanova Lindsay Davenport
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 2009 22 16 38 57.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2010 25 16 41 61.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9%
22 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
23 2013 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0%
24 2014 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 77 61 138 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alisa Kleybanova Lindsay Davenport
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2004 1514 101.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 1499 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02
16 2006 1473 97.0 -1.84 -0.90 0.854 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.02 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48
18 2008 1647 137.2 +0.59 +0.97 1.026 50.5% -43 -112 +90 50.0% +0.24 7–3 (70%) 0–3 (0%) 103.5 -0.20 1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86
19 2009 1781 141.6 +1.51 +0.24 1.040 50.9% -6 -169 -80 56.4% +0.35 10–13 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.3 +2.38 1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77
20 2010 1828 151.3 +2.66 +0.90 1.067 51.6% +4 -191 -99 56.8% +0.62 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 96.7 -1.00 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62
21 2011 1780 142.2 +1.00 +1.86 1.072 51.5% +40 -131 — 53.3% +0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.66 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58
22 2012 1777 108.2 -0.89 -1.44 0.834 48.0% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.25 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47
23 2013 1770 112.0 -1.63 +0.12 0.852 46.4% +18 — — 42.1% -1.16 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -0.13 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25
24 2014 1772 126.6 +0.26 +0.71 0.947 49.3% +40 -113 — 50.0% -0.23 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.87 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63
27 2017 1764 109.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18
Career — 1878 145.8 +1.33 +0.77 1.030 50.7% +3 -147 0 53.0% +0.27 35–28 (56%) 16–23 (41%) 99.6 -0.40 — 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.