H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alisa Kleybanova vs Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro H2H: 1-0
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 1–0 lead over Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2009 Australian Open second round 6-1 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | #183 | #61 | 760 | 1,599 | 44 | 80 | 35.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alisa Kleybanova | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #68 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #112 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #97 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #122 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |