H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 1-0

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2010 Birmingham round of 16 4-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Riske-Amritraj #185 4-6 7-5 6-1 Anna Chakvetadze #114 Match data Jun 11, 2010* R16 Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,066 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,715 0 0
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,914 0 2
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,988 0 6
21 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,723 0 7
22 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,714 0 7
23 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,714 0 8
24 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,640 0 8
25 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,555 0 8
26 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Anna Chakvetadze
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 23 11 34 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
20 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 39 13 52 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
22 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5% — — — — — 121 86 207 58.5% 29 30 59 49.2% 22 15 37 59.5% 11 4 15 73.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's and 250/318 of Anna Chakvetadze's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Anna Chakvetadze
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/5 3.3 5.3 61.2% 60.8% 43.7% 34.3% 55.6% 54.0% 45.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 13/45 1.8 4.8 58.2% 62.8% 38.8% 47.2% 39.5% 53.3% 43.6%
19 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7% 2006 39/57 2.9 3.7 59.4% 64.2% 46.6% 54.3% 46.9% 57.0% 44.8%
20 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5% 2007 67/75 3.0 3.7 60.3% 66.4% 49.0% 57.7% 51.2% 59.4% 47.0%
21 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7% 2008 44/49 3.6 6.5 55.3% 64.7% 41.6% 55.3% 53.0% 54.3% 47.1%
22 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2% 2009 31/32 1.8 5.7 63.5% 60.6% 41.0% 48.9% 53.9% 53.4% 44.7%
23 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5% 2010 33/33 1.7 5.0 61.2% 60.5% 45.7% 53.6% 50.7% 55.1% 45.8%
24 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3% 2011 9/11 2.1 3.8 58.9% 60.7% 41.5% 50.7% 47.5% 53.1% 46.0%
25 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0% 2012 11/11 2.5 3.4 60.5% 62.6% 40.0% 44.4% 57.5% 53.5% 41.2%
26 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7% — 250/318 2.7 4.7 59.7% 63.6% 44.6% 53.4% 50.7% 55.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Anna Chakvetadze
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1528 120.5 +0.93 +0.41 0.997 50.0% +25 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1716 140.9 -0.63 +0.16 0.934 48.6% -37 -113 -71 51.9% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 0–7 (0%) 103.3 -1.79
19 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48 2006 1915 148.0 +1.63 +1.41 1.040 50.8% -5 -246 -221 63.0% +0.79 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 107.1 -2.00
20 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54 2007 1988 159.4 +3.68 +3.72 1.156 53.1% +9 -222 -132 69.6% +1.32 15–4 (79%) 11–10 (52%) 107.4 -0.45
21 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29 2008 1724 136.7 -0.16 +2.53 1.031 50.8% +43 -1 +130 53.3% +0.29 12–14 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 +2.95
22 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38 2009 1714 134.0 -0.92 +1.31 0.958 49.2% +9 +9 +92 45.7% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 -0.09
23 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46 2010 1714 128.7 -0.49 +1.32 1.020 50.4% +15 -55 +111 56.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.41
24 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44 2011 1641 112.2 +0.12 +1.73 0.980 49.6% +60 — — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — -0.46
25 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28 2012 1556 102.0 -1.55 -1.87 0.886 47.7% +83 +20 — 36.4% -0.91 0–2 0–1 — +0.48
26 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51 — 2067 147.7 +0.95 +1.99 1.038 50.8% +11 -114 -36 56.9% +0.44 62–48 (56%) 29–38 (43%) 99.6 -0.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.