H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 3-3

Alison Riske-Amritraj and Coco Vandeweghe are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2021 San Jose first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Riske-Amritraj #37 6-3 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #162 Match data Aug 5, 2021* R32 San Jose WTA 500 Hard
Coco Vandeweghe #16 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(12) Alison Riske-Amritraj #63 Match data Jun 16, 2018* QF Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Coco Vandeweghe #22 2-6 6-3 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #49 Match data Aug 30, 2017* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Coco Vandeweghe #25 6-2 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #46 Match data Jul 9, 2017* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Alison Riske-Amritraj #38 6-4 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #21 Match data Feb 21, 2017* R64 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #78 6-3 0-1 (ret.) Coco Vandeweghe #35 Match data Jul 23, 2016* QF Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
25 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 370/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7% 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2017 43/43 1.1 3.3 68.0% 61.9% 43.7% 51.6% 44.0% 56.0% 42.4% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1% 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
32 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 370/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.6% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.3% 42.7% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.48 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) — +1.49
20 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.12
22 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.26
23 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.46 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — -1.43
24 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.44 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.72
25 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.28 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.53 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) — -1.00
26 2017 1642 129.3 +0.18 -0.33 0.963 49.1% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) — -2.21 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.76
27 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.45 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.98 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — 0.00 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.17
30 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.58 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.60 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
32 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1860 137.7 +0.66 +0.22 1.001 49.9% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.