H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-0

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2013 New Haven round of 32 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Stefanie Voegele
Switzerland Age 36 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Riske-Amritraj #95 7-5 6-1 Stefanie Voegele #47 Match data Aug 22, 2013* R32 New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Stefanie Voegele #1,075 #42 1,255 1,700 100 173 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Stefanie Voegele
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #124 1,486 0 0
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0 2009 10–9 52.6% #75 1,559 0 0
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0 2010 9–22 29.0% #135 1,504 0 0
21 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #138 1,518 0 0
22 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0 2012 2–7 22.2% #92 1,498 0 0
23 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1 2013 21–20 51.2% #50 1,664 0 0
24 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1 2014 14–23 37.8% #79 1,544 0 0
25 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1 2015 7–17 29.2% #119 1,510 0 0
26 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1 2016 10–14 41.7% #114 1,517 0 0
27 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1 2017 5–4 55.6% #169 1,650 0 0
28 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2 2018 9–17 34.6% #83 1,594 0 0
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2 2019 6–15 28.6% #119 1,594 0 0
30 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3 2020 1–5 16.7% #116 1,602 0 0
31 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3 2021 4–12 25.0% #147 1,537 0 0
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3 2022 1–5 16.7% #260 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Stefanie Voegele
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2012 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 13 13 26 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2016 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2017 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 4 10 14 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
32 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5% — — — — — 66 106 172 38.4% 29 48 77 37.7% 4 17 21 19.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's and 262/273 of Stefanie Voegele's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Stefanie Voegele
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 1.5 5.0 60.0% 55.1% 33.6% 16.3% 35.9% 46.4% 44.3%
19 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7% 2009 19/19 2.7 3.2 55.6% 66.8% 41.1% 47.3% 48.0% 55.2% 43.4%
20 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5% 2010 30/31 2.8 2.4 56.1% 60.6% 44.0% 42.9% 45.1% 53.4% 42.3%
21 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7% 2011 2/2 3.5 2.5 58.4% 56.9% 43.4% 50.0% 34.7% 51.7% 40.6%
22 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2% 2012 8/9 2.5 4.1 53.6% 59.9% 42.3% 48.9% 33.7% 51.9% 41.9%
23 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5% 2013 40/41 3.5 2.7 54.9% 66.3% 46.8% 48.5% 40.8% 57.6% 41.9%
24 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3% 2014 36/37 4.4 1.9 56.4% 64.9% 42.8% 47.4% 49.5% 55.2% 42.3%
25 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0% 2015 17/24 3.1 2.3 60.4% 60.0% 45.8% 54.8% 47.5% 54.2% 37.1%
26 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4% 2016 24/24 2.6 1.8 56.8% 61.1% 42.5% 48.6% 43.8% 53.2% 42.7%
27 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3% 2017 9/9 3.9 3.0 55.5% 63.6% 42.5% 53.3% 44.0% 54.3% 42.0%
28 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1% 2018 26/26 3.3 1.9 56.8% 64.0% 47.0% 49.9% 36.3% 56.4% 38.5%
29 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1% 2019 21/21 2.2 2.8 56.8% 62.3% 40.6% 44.6% 46.9% 53.0% 41.5%
30 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1% 2020 6/6 2.0 3.0 53.4% 63.9% 39.8% 43.6% 31.9% 52.8% 40.3%
31 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7% 2021 16/16 2.4 2.8 56.4% 59.0% 42.2% 53.8% 40.4% 51.7% 40.3%
32 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2% 2022 6/6 0.8 3.7 51.6% 51.5% 31.0% 44.0% 48.0% 42.1% 40.6%
Career — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7% — 262/273 3.0 2.5 56.2% 62.8% 43.4% 47.9% 43.5% 54.3% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Stefanie Voegele
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 102.6 +0.81 +2.45 0.828 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–0 — -0.30
19 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48 2009 1559 110.5 -1.00 -0.45 0.970 48.9% -15 — +110 44.4% -0.20 7–0 (100%) 0–3 (0%) 107.0 +1.19
20 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54 2010 1504 114.4 -2.38 -0.92 0.908 47.8% +41 -52 — 37.7% -0.88 1–8 (11%) 4–5 (44%) 92.7 +0.26
21 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29 2011 1518 101.1 -0.37 -0.64 0.842 46.1% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — -0.21
22 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38 2012 1498 112.2 -1.83 -0.15 0.870 46.8% -12 +15 — 31.8% -1.23 1–3 (25%) — — -0.33
23 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46 2013 1665 132.8 +0.93 -1.21 0.988 49.8% -31 -48 -123 46.9% -0.05 14–4 (78%) 5–8 (38%) 112.4 -0.72
24 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44 2014 1544 116.4 -1.15 -1.36 0.944 48.6% +18 +54 — 43.7% -0.69 3–12 (20%) 6–6 (50%) 91.8 +0.91
25 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28 2015 1511 109.4 -3.15 -3.22 0.811 46.1% +55 +2 — 30.2% -1.26 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.11
26 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21 2016 1517 103.6 -2.18 -1.45 0.912 48.0% +27 +22 -70 42.0% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +1.52
27 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45 2017 1651 123.2 -0.54 +0.06 0.918 48.3% +32 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 1–0 — +0.12
28 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98 2018 1594 119.0 +0.12 -3.10 0.884 47.4% +36 -67 -143 39.3% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 -1.04
29 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00 2019 1594 116.8 -2.79 -1.89 0.882 47.2% +41 -76 — 34.8% -1.02 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.2 -0.08
30 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58 2020 1602 112.7 -0.73 -1.09 0.854 46.6% +29 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–2 1–1 — +0.01
31 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60 2021 1538 111.9 -2.04 -1.43 0.834 46.0% +15 -4 — 28.9% -1.40 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.06
32 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21 2022 1498 106.8 -4.32 -2.01 0.701 41.9% +78 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 — — +0.47
Career — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51 — 1700 120.1 -1.29 -1.46 0.904 47.8% +20 -14 -33 39.1% -0.79 41–51 (45%) 24–37 (39%) 96.3 +0.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.