H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alla Kudryavtseva vs Elena Dementieva H2H: 0-1
Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elena Dementieva | 6-4 6-1 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alla Kudryavtseva | Elena Dementieva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |