H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alla Kudryavtseva vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 0-2
Sybille Bammer holds a 2–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2009 Prague fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2009* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sybille Bammer | 6-1 6-1 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2008* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Sybille Bammer | 7-6(9) 1-6 7-5 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alla Kudryavtseva | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |